Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Crummy Crumb

In my opinion, Crumb’s illustrations do change the stories in Genesis, whether he intended to or not. Just the simple fact that the illustrations exist will change a reader’s perception of the story. A person reading Genesis straight out of the Bible will naturally create different images in his or her mind than Crumb’s. By giving the reader a set image to view the story through, Crumb can either be adding or detracting from the story. One person who has read Genesis and Crumb’s version may say they preferred the original story and their own interpretation to Crumb’s, whereas maybe having the scenes illustrated made the story much more interesting and readable to another. It may simply be that the reader likes or dislikes Crumb’s art style that determines if it adds or detracts from the story. For me his art detracts from the story because it is exceptionally ugly.
                Crumb did have to take liberties with the illustrations. How do you decide how God, who most believe cannot be given an image, should be depicted? He had to take liberties depicting the characters’ appearances, emotions, and actions. By doing these things he has changed the way readers view the stories of Genesis.
                Crumb’s illustrations would’ve been considered heresy in the past, and probably still are considered that way by some. I think there are many reasons it’s more acceptable now than it was back then. The Bible itself is not taken quite as seriously, every rule stated not necessarily having to be followed. Then there are all the freedoms we have now-a-days, like freedom of speech and expression. He is legally allowed to create a work like this so it’s obviously acceptable in that way. I think it also makes the stories easier to understand and more interesting for people in modern times to have pictures.
                I believe that Crumb tried to make an unbiased translation of Genesis through his work. It seems that he didn’t try to put in any of his own beliefs or feelings into the art. I think that he found it interesting and so wanted to create a direct translation of the work. 

6 comments:

  1. Why do you think that the visual image is "more interesting for people in modern times"? We are constantly bombarded by images; Wouldn't this overload somehow cheapen the image or make it less effective?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right that Crumb was forced to take liberty in some if not most of his illustrations. I agree that not only is the bible taken less seriously than in previous generations but also religeon in general is taken less seriously. Allthough there are still fanatics, as a society religeon has become much less of a factor.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree with you Brittany. In modern times all forms of media are highly dependent on visual aids of all sorts, which leaves present day people unimaginative and leaning heavily on visual "crutches". "Crutches" don't bother me unless, like you pointed out in the case of Crumb's illustrations, they are mediocre. That being said, Crumb's work is already handicapped by the fact comic strips are not as popular as they once were, being superseded by other more hi-tec forms of visual media.... point withstanding "Genesis in 3D! Graphicaly Depicted! Nothing Left Out!" sounds like the next James Cameron box office hit to me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You must think of the audience Crumb is trying to reach. He is trying to reach those who may not process Genesis the way it should be by just reading it, and not those who understand every word and the subtleties within the text.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I totally think he put his own feeling into it, making it his own art style and all. And I mean, as an artist, you can't completely change your style. I don't think he should have illustrated a part of the Bible at all, mainly because his drawings are disturbing and he doesn't seem to have the purest reputation. However, out of all the Bible's books, Genesis seems to be the most fucked up, so he made the best choice he could. This doesn't exactly scream divine to me though .... http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/c/0/0/80/c/AAAADO9qBikAAAAAAIDIeA.jpg?v=1257197387000

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe that while Crumb my have been trying to depict Genesis in a humble way, sometimes his artistic ability got the best of him. He chose to take those liberties to add to the allure of his comic. I think Crumb had a new aspect that the world was ready to see, but his is just one man's depiction.

    ReplyDelete