
Although blood is often related as the source of death and at times the source of life in Stoker’s Dracula, blood can also be seen as a means to measure the extremity of love. How far would one go to save the one they loved? Would one give one’s blood? One’s source of life? Furthermore, is love ultimately the measure of one’s worth and dictating force of life?
Stoker’s Dracula emphasizes the idea that love is measured in blood. The constant transfusions needed to maintain Lucy alive shows that without love life would cease to exist, or rather that the humanity in an individual would cease to exist. Without the driving force of love each donor had for Lucy, Lucy would not have been able to survive for as long as she did before becoming a vampire.

"A brave man's blood is the best thing on this earth when a woman is in trouble.'" (Chapter 10)
When love is present, one would do anything to the point of giving one's blood. It was the sacrifice of giving blood from the men in her life who loved her (Dr. Seward, Van Helsing, Quincy, and Arthur) that Lucy held onto life. Even the above quote shows that love is the driving force behind the sacrifice of love when one's love is in danger or harm. Furthermore, love can lead to bravery to the point of sacrificing one's own blood because of love.
I've never considered blood to be associated with love before. I appreciated your perspective on how much a person loves someone can be "measured" in blood. I dislike, however, the idea of a patriarchal society.
ReplyDelete